References
ISA Research
- Scanlon, D. M., Gelzheiser, L. M., Vellutino, F. R., Schatschneider, C., & Sweeny, J. M. (2008). Reducing the incidence of early reading difficulties: Professional development for classroom teachers versus direct interventions for children. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(3), 346–359.
- Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Zhang, H., & Schatschneider, C. (2008). Using response to kindergarten and first-grade intervention to identify children at risk for long-term reading difficulties. Reading and Writing, 21, 437–480.
- Scanlon, D. M., Vellutino, F. R., Small, S. G., Fanuele, D. P., & Sweeny, J. M. (2005). Severe reading difficulties—can they be prevented? A comparison of prevention and intervention approaches. Exceptionality, 13(4), 209–227.
- Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. M. (2002). The interactive strategies approach to reading intervention. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(4), 573–635.
- Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., & Lyon, G. R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ-achievement discrepancy definition of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(3), 223–238.
- Scanlon, D. M., & Vellutino, F. R. (1997). A comparison of the instructional backgrounds and cognitive profiles of poor, average, and good readers who were initially identified as at risk for reading failure. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(3), 191–215.
- Scanlon, D. M., & Vellutino, F. R. (1996). Prerequisite skills, early instruction, and success in first-grade reading: Selected results from a longitudinal study. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 2, 54–63.
- Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S. G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., et al. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 601–638.
Books/Chapters Related to the ISA and RtI
- Scanlon, D.M., Anderson, K.L., & Vellutino, F.R. (2013). The Interactive Strategies Approach to early literacy intervention. In D. M. Barone and M. H. Mallette (Eds.), Best Practices in Early Literacy Instruction. New York: Guilford.
- Scanlon, D.M. (2011). Response to intervention as an assessment: The role of assessment and instruction. In A. McGill-Franzen and R.L. Allington (Eds.), The Handbook of Reading Disabilities Research, New York: Routledge.
- Anderson, K. L. (2010). Spotlight on the Interactive Strategies Approach: The case of Roosevelt Elementary School. In M. Y. Lipson and K. K. Wixson (Eds.), Successful Approaches to RTI: Collaborative Practices for Improving K–12 Literacy (pp. 66–87). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
- Scanlon, D.M. & Anderson, K.L. (2010). Using the Interactive Strategies Approach to prevent reading difficulties in an RTI context. In M. Y. Lipson and K. K. Wixson (Eds.), Successful Approaches to RTI: Collaborative Practices for Improving K–12 Literacy (pp. 20–65). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
- Scanlon, D. M., Anderson, K. L., & Sweeney, J. M (2010). Early Intervention for Reading Difficulties: The Interactive Strategies Approach. New York: Guilford.
- Scanlon, D. M. & Sweeney, J.M. (2010). Kindergarten intervention: Teaching to prevent reading difficulties. In P. Johnston (Ed.), RTI in Literacy: Responsive and Comprehensive (pp. 178–196). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Copyright: All resources and materials accessed via this site are protected by U.S. Copyright Law. Resources and materials are provided for use by ELTEP participants only, for use in literacy education courses taught at participating universities. Any other reproduction or use of materials, including emailing downloaded files to non-participants or copying/sharig of videos is strictly prohibited.
This website was developed under grant # P116B100060 from the U.S. Department of Education. However, the contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government.
